A different way to look at financing
A growing business can be profitable and still face a gap between paying suppliers and collecting customer invoices. Securitisation is one way of considering financing through the cash flows of a defined asset pool. The starting question is practical: can these cash flows be documented, assessed and monitored reliably?
How does the structure work?
In a traditional securitisation, an originator pools assets and transfers them to a separate issuing vehicle. The issuer raises money by selling securities, with payments supported by collections from the pool. Different classes, or tranches, may have different payment priorities and loss exposure. Synthetic securitisation is different: it transfers credit risk without transferring the assets themselves. IMF: What Is Securitization? ↗
Why might a company consider it?
A well-designed structure can broaden access to funding and investors. In banking, qualifying transactions can also support risk transfer and capital management. These benefits depend on the structure; a securitisation does not automatically eliminate risk, remove assets from the balance sheet or provide cheaper finance. Poor incentives and weak underlying assets can undermine the transaction. IMF: Reforming securitisation ↗
An illustrative example
Imagine a company with £10 million of eligible receivables. For illustration only, assume a structure raises £8 million against that pool. The remaining £2 million is a difference between the pool value and funding raised, not an immediate profit or a standard market requirement. Fees, reserves and any retained interest affect the cash actually available. Collections would be applied under the agreed payment priorities. This simplified example is not a financing offer, valuation or forecast.
What deserves the closest attention?
Asset quality, dependable performance data and understandable transaction documents matter. Review customer concentration, defaults, early repayments, currency and interest-rate mismatches, and the ability to continue collections if a servicer fails. Payment priorities must be clear. Simplicity and transparency help analysis; they do not replace due diligence or make an investment risk-free. BCBS–IOSCO: transparency criteria ↗
A practical preparation checklist
Before discussing a transaction, prepare a receivables ageing report, historical collection records, customer concentration analysis and a cash-flow forecast. Identify disputed invoices and existing security interests. Ask advisers to compare the full cost and ongoing reporting burden with alternatives such as a bank facility or receivables finance. This is a preparation framework, not an exhaustive eligibility test.
The legal structure comes before execution
Terminology and permitted structures vary by jurisdiction. In Türkiye, the Capital Markets Board publishes specific disclosure and application documents for asset-backed securities. That does not mean every commercial receivable is eligible. The applicable rules, transfer arrangements, tax and accounting treatment require transaction-specific review by qualified specialists. SPK: disclosure and application documents ↗
IBL Finance perspective
Start with the asset pool, the business objective and the quality of information—not a promised funding amount. A clear first discussion should establish what is being financed, who makes the payments, when cash is expected and what happens if collections fall short. The next step is to assess whether a securitisation structure is proportionate to the need.
For general information only; not investment, legal or tax advice, or a commitment to provide finance.
Contact us ↗